When it came to building the website, I had a reasonable idea what I was looking for. I had thought about how I wanted the site to look and what the user experience should be. Firstly, I wanted the site to be fun an friendly – its a kids products site – so you want people who come into it not be confronted with a seriously stuffy corporate website – rather something with a modicum of personality. Also wanted the purchase path for people to be as simple as possible. I didnt want people to have register to set up an account or divulge all their personal details before they can actually buy something. I also wanted the site to be easily navigable without having to wade through endless menu structures and click throughs.
So I put together a brief of what I was looking for and then went and checked out the Golden Spiders to see who had done well that year – came accross some of the companies and got in touch with them. Some of them were very good at getting back – some of them were crap (so obviously didnt pursue them). And went and met the ones who came back to me and seemed to know what they were talking about. The prices varied quite a lot. To my mind it was a straight forward build. So I was surprised at the variance.
I eventually went with a company who were a good price, very upfront and spent a lot of time going through the requirements with me, knew their way around SEO and constructed their site accordingly. They had a proprietary tool called to build the site – which had an ok back end system to manage the site and look at reports and statistics etc….As is the problem with these things you dont get your hands really dirty until the site is constructed and then you realise the limitations. I was happy withthe design process that they used – they had a great graphic designer. I was going to use the graphic designer that had developed my identity but was advised by a few different people that good print design does not always equal good web design. And I think this is probably the case.
Anyway, the web design and development process took longer than I expected. I was led to believe 5 weeks – provided I hadd all the images and desiptions, and product attributes etc… on hand. This is a lot of work – especially if you have 100’s of products. Anyway – I had a fair amount of this done but unforutnately the web co were juggling lots of balls, and there was only a certain amount of time for me – between the jigs and the reels, it took about 10 weeks to build the site. And I ended up doing most of the product population – which should have been the web co but they would have taken an age to do it – and probably made a bags of it.
So I did that bit. Whihc was good as it gave me a crash course in the CMS application. Straightaway I realised its limitations. Features that it should have had but didnt. This is one of the areas that you need to be aware of when getting a site built. Try and anticipate all eventualities and requirements when you are talking to web co.’s. Because you’ll find when you get the site that its missing a load of things that you thought should have been there but didnt have the prescience to ask.
So the alternative to going down the company with proprietary web builder tool is to get it built from scratch (bottom up) from an independent developer(s) – the cost in this may be prohibitive if you want to get the site up and running fast with an off the shelf type solution. But at the other end if the developers are good you will get a system tailor made to your spec and will have ultimate control of the site. Because one of the things that people may not have thought about is when you use these off the shelf solutions that you are tied in with these because your whole website runs off the udnerlying engine of the so-called ‘proprietary software’ so that means you cant just up sticks and get the site hosted elsewhere as you get tied into hosting and support with the web co. Its money for old rope for them, as they charge you your annual fee and give you f all back in return.
Next I’ll be chatting about the payment provider that I used and why I chose them – if I can remember.





